Law Professors Say $285M Fee Request is Too High
April 12, 2023
Categories
- Ability to Pay
- Advancement of Fees
- AI & Billing / Fees
- ALSPs
- Alternative Fees
- American Rule
- Appellate Fees
- Article / Book
- Attorney Behavior / Civility
- Attorney-Client Relationship
- Bankruptcy Fees / Expenses
- Bar Rules / Advisories
- Bill Padding
- Billing / Fee Guidelines
- Billing Increments
- Billing Judgment
- Billing Practices
- Billing Record / Entries
- Block Billing
- Catalyst Theory
- Class Fee Objector
- Class Incentive Awards
- Contingency Fees / POF
- Coverage of Fees
- Criminal Law
- Cryptocurrency
- Defense Fee Fund
- Defense Fees / Costs
- E-Billing
- Ethics & Professional Responsibility
- Exceptional Case
- Expenses / Costs
- Fee / Rate Economics
- Fee Affidavit
- Fee Agreement
- Fee Allocation / Fee Apportionment
- Fee Award
- Fee Award Data
- Fee Award Factors
- Fee Benchmark / Standard
- Fee Calculation Method
- Fee Cap / Fee Limits
- Fee Clause
- Fee Clawback
- Fee Collection
- Fee Committee
- Fee Data / Fee Analytics
- Fee Declaration
- Fee Denial
- Fee Disbursement
- Fee Discovery / Fee Disclosure
- Fee Disgorgement
- Fee Dispute
- Fee Dispute Litigation / ADR
- Fee Doctrine / Fee Theory
- Fee Engagement Letter
- Fee Entitlement / Recoverability
- Fee Examiner
- Fee Expert / Member
- Fee Fund
- Fee Issues on Appeal
- Fee Jurisprudence
- Fee Lien
- Fee Proposal / Bid
- Fee Recommendation
- Fee Reduction
- Fee Request
- Fee Retainer
- Fee Scholarship
- Fee Sharing / Referral Fees
- Fee Shifting
- Fees & Arbitration
- Fees & Bad Faith
- Fees & Claims Rate
- Fees & Common Fund
- Fees & Corp. Bylaws
- Fees & Duty to Defend
- Fees & Duty to Indemnify
- Fees & Fiduciary Duty
- Fees & Independent Counsel
- Fees & Insurance Policy
- Fees & Judicial Discretion
- Fees & Liability Insurance
- Fees & Litigation Tactics
- Fees & Misconduct
- Fees & Privilege / Confidentaility
- Fees & Pro Bono
- Fees & Taxes / Tax Cases
- Fees & Timeliness
- Fees & Withdrawing / Terminated
- Fees as Damages
- Fees as Sanctions
- Fees by Tiers / Scale
- Fees for Fees / Fees on Fees
- Fees in Arbitration
- Fees in Escrow
- Fees in Statutes
- Fees in Transactional Matters
- Fees in Trust & Estates
- Fees more than Damages
- Fees Paid by Gov't / Taxpayers
- Fees Paid by Insurers
- Fixed Fee
- FRCP
- General
- Historic / Landmark Case
- Holdback Fees
- Hourly Billing
- Hourly Rate Survey
- Hourly Rates
- Hours Billled
- In-House Counsel
- Interest on Fees
- Interim Fees
- Intra-Law Firm Fee Dispute
- Laffey Matrix
- Law Firm Economics
- Law Firm Management
- Lawyering
- LEDES / UTBMS
- Legal Bill Review (External)
- Legal Bill Review (Internal / Pre-Bill)
- Legal Bills / Legal Costs
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Profession
- Legal Spend
- Legislation / Politics
- Litigation Economics
- Litigation Financing / Funding
- Litigation Management
- Lodestar
- Lodestar Crosscheck
- Lodestar Multiplier
- Mootness Fees
- NALFA in the News
- NALFA News
- Novel Fee Ruling / Award
- Offer of Judgment (Rule 68)
- Overbilling
- Practice Area: Bankruptcy / Restructuring
- Practice Area: Civil Rights / Public Interest
- Practice Area: Class Action / Mass Tort / MDL
- Practice Area: Insurance Coverage Litigation
- Practice Area: IP Litigation
- Prevailing Party Issues
- Professional Fees
- PTAB
- Quantum Meruit
- Qui Tam / Whistleblower
- Risk Management
- SCOTUS
- Settlement Data / Terms
- Staffing Issues
- Statutory Fees
- Study / Report
- Success Fees
- Supplemental Fees
- Third-Party Payer
- Timekeepers
- Trial / Jury / Verdict
- Trustee Fees
- UK / International
- Unpaid Fees
- USCOFC
- USPTO
- USTP